CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit reviews pull requests for defects, policy issues, and code quality.
Overview
- Transparency
- 6 / 10
- Trust
- 99 / 100
Trains on your data
- Free
- No
- Paid
- No
- Opt-out
- Not captured
Incidents
1- mediumCodeRabbit’s Production Servers RCE Vulnerability Enables Write Access on 1M Repositories
Assessed SEP 21, 2026 · Checked by hand SEP 21, 2026
CodeRabbit confirms four compliance frameworks, prohibits customer-code training, uses provider zero data retention, and confirms one remediated vulnerability without customer exposure.
Trust breakdown
99 / 100
Overall trust score
Data and privacy
Trains on your data
No training on user data
Storage regions
Sub-processors
Data retention
While the code is shared with Third-Party AI Model Providers, CodeRabbit has a zero data retention policy with each Third-Party AI Model Provider.
Deletion: We will use commercially reasonable efforts to honor your requests for deletion; however, certain residual information may actively persist on the Service even if you close your account.
Incidents
2025-01-24
Powered by
CodeRabbit uses a multi-model architecture, blending efficient open models for context gathering and frontier models (primarily from OpenAI and Anthropic) for review reasoning. They also integrate NVIDIA Nemotron for context summarization, especially for self-hosted customers.
Integrations and access
Integrations
Available on
Pricing
Essentials
$24/developer/month
Agentic code reviews for every PR. Billed annually. $30/developer/month when billed monthly.
Team
$48/developer/month
All features in Essentials, plus multi-repo analysis, custom pre-merge checks, finishing touches (unit tests, merge conflict resolution, simplify), post-merge actions, and higher limits. Billed annually. $60/developer/month when billed monthly.
Advanced
$72/developer/month
Everything in Team, plus blast radius and architectural impact analysis, security review of every PR, continuous security monitoring, and higher limits. Billed annually. $90/developer/month when billed monthly.
Enterprise
Custom
Custom pricing. Includes all Advanced plan features, custom RBAC, SSO, audit logging, API access, self-hosting option, multi-org support, SLA support, technical enablement, dedicated CSM, pay via Claude/AWS/GCP marketplace, vendor security review and agreement redlines, custom setup including ALB, etc., and EU SaaS deployment. Billed annually.
Prices as listed on SEP 21, 2026; check the vendor's page.
Moat and openness
Moat
- Proprietary Model
- Proprietary Data
- Network Effects
- Switching Costmoderate
- Unique UX
- Distributionmoderate
CodeRabbit leverages a sophisticated multi-model architecture and offers a comprehensive suite of features beyond basic code review, including security and planning tools, which provides some defensibility. However, its reliance on third-party LLMs and the absence of proprietary data or strong network effects limit its long-term moat. The switching cost is moderate due to integrations and workflow embedding, but not insurmountable.
Openness
- Open model weights
- Published research
- Open source contributions
- Transparency reports
- Public safety evals
CodeRabbit is not open source, and its code is not publicly available. The company is transparent about its data privacy practices, stating that customer code is not used for model training and outlining how data is shared with third-party services like OpenAI and Anthropic for review purposes. They also offer a free plan for open-source projects and commit significant resources to supporting the open-source community. While they provide detailed documentation and pricing transparency for their paid plans, the specifics of how their AI reviews are generated are considered proprietary. They have a privacy policy and a data protection officer.
Timeline
- 2024-08CodeRabbit raised $16 million in Series A funding.
Company
CodeRabbit Inc
- Founded
- 2023
- HQ
- San Francisco, California, United States
- Site
- coderabbit.ai
Popularity
0
monthly visits
Notable customers
CodeRabbit is expanding from AI code review into Agentic Change Management, launching Triage, Change Stack and CodeRabbit Security, and competes with companies like Qodo, Greptile, and CodeAnt AI in the growing global code review services market.
Value and ROI
What it should move: It shortens reviews and catches basic defects before merge.
Best fit
It fits teams with documented coding rules that want an automated first review.
The catch
Automated review comments can create noise or false confidence. Set repository permissions and review policies, and assign responsibility for merging changes.
- Abnormal AI: Uses CodeRabbit for automated code review and policy checks across generated and human-written changes.[1]
- LeoLabs: Uses CodeRabbit for pull-request feedback, edge-case review and security checks.[2]
In our stacks for
References
- 01Abnormal AI: how it uses CodeRabbitCodeRabbitVendor-published
- 02LeoLabs: how it uses CodeRabbitCodeRabbitVendor-published
- 03Privacy policyCodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 04TermsCodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 05Trust centerCodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 06Pricing pageCodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 07Company siteCodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 08SOC 2CodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 09ISO 27001CodeRabbit IncVendor-published
- 10CodeRabbit’s Production Servers RCE Vulnerability Enables Write Access on 1M RepositoriesCodeRabbitIndependent